Project

Bump2Baby and Me is a five-year project to develop and evaluate an innovative healthcare intervention to help prevent maternal and child diabetes, overweight and obesity and other non-communicable associated diseases.

What is the project about?

The Bump2Baby and Me project consists of three key elements:

  • The development of the Bump2Baby and Me mHealth Coaching Programme and setting up of the randomised controlled trial (Year 1);
  • Implementation of the randomised controlled trial (Year 2-4);
  • Evaluation of the randomised controlled trial including its cost effectiveness, and the development of the implementation toolkit and policy options (Year 5).

*WP is Work Package

Download project leaflet

Why does it matter?

Gestational diabetes is a growing burden worldwide and has a significant impact on health services. Around one in eight pregnant women will experience gestational diabetes. This can seriously affect the future health of women and their children.

50%

of pregnancies have obesity or overweight issues* [1]

18%

of pregnancies affected by gestational diabetes* [2]

10x

more likely for mothers to develop type 2 diabetes if had gestational diabetes* [3]

59%

increased risk of early childhood overweight or obesity where mothers' had gestational diabetes* [4]

hispanic pregnant woman

Who is involved?

The consortium is led by University College Dublin and involves nine partners from five countries. It brings together world-leaders in maternal and child health alongside a cutting-edge mobile health technology company. The expertise across the partners covers implementation science, clinical practice, mobile health, public health nutrition, health psychology, health economics, biostatistics, complex intervention design and communications.

The project also has an External Advisory Board established to provide independent scientific, policy and ethics advice and support to the consortium. The External Advisory Board members are:

  • Professor Molly Byrne, University of Galway;
  • Dr Fionnuala Gough, Trinity College Dublin;
  • Professor Helen Murphy, University of East Anglia;
  • Professor Ciaran O’Neill, Queen’s University Belfast.

Our research

Our research is split into nine work packages (WPs), designed to specifically meet the project’s objectives.

This work package will perform a systematic scoping review to identify and deconstruct effective interventions, including examining the cost effectiveness of the interventions. The review will consider other apps or programmes which are already in the marketplace and develop an understanding of how they have been implemented and how effective they are. This work will guide the mapping and classification of behaviour change to enable the development of an optimised framework for postnatal intervention.

Partners involved: Monash University (Lead), University College Dublin, University of Copenhagen.

Work package 2’s main output will be to deliver a tailored and co-created Bump2Baby and Me app in both English and Spanish. The co-creation will be done with input from key stakeholders in each country (Australia, Ireland, Spain, and UK). The app will include content and a health coach manual, and inter-country differences such as guidelines and local practices.

Partners involved: Liva Healthcare (Lead), Aarhus University, Monash University, University of Bristol, University of Copenhagen, University of Granada.

The objectives of work package 3 are to identify and map the external contextual factors that influence both gestational weight gain and gestational diabetes (GDM) management for each trial site; and to identify the use of GDM risk screening tools and GDM mHealth technology across each site.

Information from work package 1 will guide the mapping work and this work will inform work packages 4 and 5.

Partners involved: University of Bristol (Lead), Monash University, University College Dublin, University of Granada.

Work package 4 will develop and deliver two training systems: 1) A training system for healthcare staff to implement the GDM screening tool within EU sites; 2) A health coaching training programme for working with women during their infants’ first 1,000 days. Recruitment of health coaches and evaluation of the intervention delivery are also included in WP4.

Partners involved: University of Copenhagen (Lead), Liva Healthcare, North Bristol NHS Trust, University College Dublin, University of Bristol, University of Granada.

This work package will initiate the randomised controlled trial, ensuring it runs according to best ethical and trial procedures. The trial will begin at the Dublin site and  will be subsequently rolled out across the other country sites in the UK, Spain and Australia. This will ensure maximum learning amongst sites.

Partners involved: University of Copenhagen (Lead), Liva Healthcare, Monash University, North Bristol NHS Trust, University College Dublin, University of Bristol, University of Granada.

Work package 6 will drive the analysis plans and integration of findings into dissemination activities (WP8). It includes developing strategies for the analysis of outcomes, cost-effectiveness, data, and factors associated with the success of the intervention. It will also evaluate the results of the statistical analyses and the cost-effectiveness analysis, comparing results across settings.

Partners involved: University College Dublin (Lead), Aarhus University, Beta Technology, Deakin University, Liva Healthcare, Monash University, University of Bristol, University of Copenhagen, University of Granada.

The aim of work package 7 is to ensure timely, effective and successful delivery of the project by providing a high level of administrative, contractual, financial and managerial support. The project is coordinated by Dr Sharleen O’Reilly from University College Dublin and supported by all partners.

Work package 8 will ensure that the outcomes and achievements from the project are effectively transferred to end users and there is measurable uptake. This includes promotion of the project and its activities and results to a wide range of stakeholders, enabling knowledge transfer and innovation and maximising the project’s impacts. An implementation forum will be set up to guide and facilitate engagement with policymakers and healthcare decision makers throughout the project.

WP8 is led by Beta, supported by UCD and all other project partners.

Work package 9 is responsible for monitoring the ethics and data privacy for the project. It will ensure that it follows the necessary criteria and procedures for ethics and the data is GDPR compliant. The ethics work package receives external and independent advice from the project’s External Advisory Board.

This work package is led by University College Dublin.

What is the expected impact?

There are four main outcomes expected from the project. These key exploitable outcomes will deliver wider impacts for healthcare, the economy and society.

Bump2Baby and Me mHealth Coaching Programme

The innovative intervention is aimed at women at high risk of developing gestational diabetes and provides women with personalised evidence-based healthy eating and exercise information, both during pregnancy and for the first year after birth, via a smartphone app and real-life health coach.

 

 

Implementation Toolkit

Information and resources to support the implementation and scale up of the Bump2Baby and Me intervention. It is anticipated that the toolkit will contain: a road map on stakeholder engagement across management and frontline staff, project governance recommendations, training resources and implementation and delivery framework, recommendations and resources targeting staff, women and managers (including resources required and anticipated savings).

 

Economic Model

It is anticipated that the remotely delivered Bump2Baby and Me intervention will offer a low-cost solution for healthcare systems. Economic modelling of the intervention will be undertaken, comparing the costs and consequences of the intervention to usual care. This will help to inform policy and health stakeholders about the value of the intervention; providing justification for implementing the intervention within publicly funded health and social care systems.

 

Policy Options

Policy options will be developed to inform future policy on maternal and early life interventions in the context of weight management and gestational diabetes. The policy options will be backed up by robust evidence generated during the project and will incorporate aspects of the economic model referred to above.

What previous research is the project based on?

The project will take the evidence outlined below and synthesise it to create an innovative and unique approach to managing weight management in pregnancy and the first year of life to ensure both mother and baby have a healthy pregnancy and the best start in life.

EvidenceDetailLink to publication
EvidenceMonash GDM Screening Tool, 2011Detail

4,276 women attending a large tertiary hospital were screened using risk factors for GDM easily identified at the first-trimester midwifery hospital booking visit. This risk prediction tool identified women at high risk of GDM and represents a novel approach to facilitate targeted early intervention.

Link to publication

View publication

EvidencePregnancy Exercise, nutrition with App support Research Study (PEARS), 2015-2017Detail

PEARS was a lifestyle intervention versus usual care in women with BMI > 25kg/m2. The intervention focused on a low diet and exercise grounded in behaviour theory delivered using an individual session and a phone app. Whilst the trial did not reduce GDM, there were significant differences in reduced gestational weight gain and lower rates of large gestational age infants in those using the intervention.

Link to publication

View publication

EvidenceInFANT and My Baby Now Detail

A trial delivered for children aged 3-18 months through first-time pregnancy groups. The trial significantly improved energy-balance behaviours in mothers and children at 18 month and 5 year follow ups. Mothers and children both experienced healthier behaviours including eating more vegetables, eating fewer sugary snacks and greater dietary knowledge. The trial confirmed the hypothesis that early childhood interventions could have significant and meaningful change in child BMI.

Link to publication

View publication

EvidenceThe Mothers After Gestational Diabetes in Australia (MAGDA); 2011-2016DetailThe study was a key component of the first and only systematic approach in the world aiming to prevent conversation from GDM to type-2 diabetes. The lifestyle intervention consisted of a single individual session, five group sessions and two follow-up phone calls, and resulted in an average 1kg difference between control and intervention groups. The weight difference is effective at reducing GDM and other long-term negative effects on the offspring. MAGDA also developed the programme further to address barriers to physical attendance by integrating health coaching and an app delivery. The programme has had significant effects on Australian policy and practice.Link to publication

View publication

EvidenceHealthy Lifestyle Programme (HeLP-her) InterventionDetail

A low intensity intervention, integrated with standard antenatal care is effective in limiting postpartum weight retention.

Link to publication

View publication


*References

[1] CME Reynolds et al. Longitudinal Study of Maternal BMI in Successive Pregnancies. Obesity (2020), 28:460-467. doi:10.1002/oby.22707

[2] NCD Risk Factor Collaboration (2016). Worldwide trends in diabetes since 1980: a pooled analysis of 751 population-based studies with 4·4 million participants. Lancet (2016), 387: 1513–30. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00618-8

[3] E Vounzoulaki et al. Progression to type 2 diabetes in women with a known history of gestational diabetes: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ (2020), 369. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m1361

[4] B Patro Golab et al. Influence of maternal obesity on the association between common pregnancy complications and risk of childhood obesity: an individual participant data meta-analysis. The Lancet Child & Adolescent Health (2018), 2(11):812-821.doi: 10.1016/S2352-4642(18)30273-6